About Joaquim Elcacho

Science and environment journalist

Protocols for developing new cities

The City Protocol Society is under way. After just over one year of preparation, the international consortium that promotes the so-called City Protocol – a set of agreements and standards that can be shared all over the world for the development of smart cities – was formally established in California in October 2013. Barcelona is playing a leading role in this process.

© Oriol Malet

San Ramon is a small city about 40 kilometres east of San Francisco (California, USA) and about 50 north of the heart of Silicon Valley. It is not as well known as Palo Alto, Cupertino, San Jose or Menlo Park, but it might become so in the medium term because San Ramon is the official headquarters of the City Protocol Society. This non-profit organisation promotes the definition and adoption of global standards for the gradual transformation of cities into what are internationally known as smart cities.

The Californian city of San Ramon hosts the official headquarters of the City Protocol Society. However a large part of the project’s soul resides in Barcelona, the capital that is also home to the secretariat of this as yet young institution (located in the Recinte Modernista de Sant Pau).

“The project was born of a discussion on the future of smart cities and the need to share experiences and solutions,” recalls Manel Sanromà, Manager of the Municipal Institute of IT of the Barcelona City Council and, since last October, Chair of the City Protocol Society. “Companies design technology to provide solutions to the problems different cities face, but since all cities have similar problems, the result is that similar solutions are made without a great degree of collaboration between cities, and they lack recommendations or standards that would make it possible to access these solutions in a more efficient and flexible manner,” explains Sanromà.

This reflection on the reality of smart cities uncovered the need to set up a forum where cities, businesses, aca­demia, research centres and civil society could help analyse problems and propose universal recommendations or standards.

Organising a process of this kind – with thousands of cities, companies and researchers working in parallel – does not seem too easy, but the internet offers a possible answer. “The miracle of the internet is that different companies, manufacturers and users end up working to the same ­standards, de facto standards that have not been imposed but have been created from the bottom up,” explains Manel Sanromà, who is highly conversant with the Internet Protocol and Internet Society creation processes.

The reality of growing smart cities and the experience accumulated with the internet inspired the creation of a City Protocol, a process that would be led by the City Protocol Society. The proposal was conceived at a meeting held in Barcelona in the summer of 2012, involving more than 200 experts and representatives of 33 cities, 15 universities and some 50 companies and institutions.

After one year of preparation and work, the City Protocol Society was formally established last October with the support of some 30 cities, companies and universities or research centres.

Manel Sanromà points out that apart from the founding act, “the key part of the process begins now, with the creation of task forces to address specific issues in areas such as energy, mobility, the environment and technology. These City Protocol task forces will begin to issue recommendations and agreements and perhaps, in the future, common standards for city development.”

A key part of this process is the definition of a participation-based procedure leading to the adoption of agreements and protocols on a global scale. The City Protocol can affect many aspects or levels of the so-called smart cities, but certainly it is easier to define standards in those areas related to technology. “Standardising governance is a task that is expected to be difficult, but to do so we must have a standardised system for publishing data about cities. This can be done through open data, for example. It is possible to consider defining global standards,” says the Manager of the Municipal Institute of IT.

In topics related to the present and also further in the future, such as the use of electric vehicles in cities, the City Protocol could be used to establish standards regarding system characteristics and battery-charging points. “We would undoubtedly find many practical examples, but the key is for the City Protocol to be applicable to all areas that we see as forming part of cities’ anatomy,” explains Sanromà. “In some cases agreements will be reached, whereas in others we may only be able to issue recommendations, although under no circumstances should we impose limitations on ourselves, because the scope is very broad.”

Now that the City Protocol process is up and running, and the City Protocol Society has been legally constituted, the immediate objective is “to spread the idea and the movement in order to reach 100 member organisations in 2014, including several dozens of cities”, continues Sanromà. Parallel to these efforts, the City Protocol Society will continue to work on organising the Task Force, or groups of people from all sectors working as volunteers to discuss problems and prepare proposals and protocols.

What is the City Protocol?
The City Protocol is a system for the rationalisation of city transformation based on dialogue and research on information, recommendations and standards that can be shared by all urban communities worldwide. The City Protocol Society (CPS) is an international non-profit organisation comprised of cities, businesses, academic institutions and other social organisations whose goal aim is to lead the creation of the City Protocol.

The City Protocol aims to work in all areas that affect the life and development of cities and their inhabitants. The task forces whose mission is to prepare agreements and standards (City Protocol Task Force) are organised into eight general areas: environment (air, land, water), infrastructures (information, water, energy), buildings (homes, construction), public spaces (streets, squares, parks), functions (living, work, health), citizens (people, organisations), information flow (legislation, economics, metabolisms) and actions (resilience, self-sufficiency, habitability, safety and innovation).

Cities, organisations and companies
“Barcelona promoted the idea and is determined to continue to bolster the project with maximum support from Mayor Xavier Trias, although there are many other cities and organisations that are working hard in this process, one that has just begun and which we must spread globally,” asserts the Chair of the City Protocol Society.

The constituent meeting of the new society was held on 31 October 2013 in Barcelona with the appointment of an initial board comprised of representatives from the cities of Amsterdam, Barcelona and Quito, the Cisco and GDF Suez companies, the Computation Institute of the University of Chicago and the New York Academy of Sciences. Other members include the cities of Dublin, Genoa and Moscow, as well as companies and organisations such as Cast Info, Cityzenith, Microsoft, OptiCits Ingenieria Urbana, Schneider Electric (formally Telvent), Institute for Advanced Architecture of Catalonia (IAAC) and the Rovira i Virgili University (URV).

Valentí Fuster. The doctor’s social commitment

“Doctors have a commitment to society that we cannot forget,” says Dr Valentí Fuster, director of the Cardiovascular Institute at the Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York and the Carlos III National Cardiovascular Research Centre in Madrid. This social vocation has led this doctor from Barcelona – one of the world’s leading cardiology experts – to work untiringly as a disseminator and educator.

Fotos: Pere Virgili

Fotos: Pere Virgili

Allow me to begin with an anecdote: some sources say that you were born in Cardona…

Yes, it’s one of those biographical errors you can find on the Internet. As an adopted son of Cardona, I am very committed to it, and my wife was born there, but I am actually from Barcelona.

Your family relationship with Barcelona could hardly be closer: your father, Dr Joaquim Fuster i Pomar, was director of psychiatry at the Hospital de Sant Pau, and both of your grandfathers were doctors; one of them, Valentí Carulla i Margenat, was rector of the University of Barcelona from 1913 to 1923…

I never met him personally, but I researched him thoroughly and wrote my maternal grandfather’s biography. Valentí Carulla was a very interesting man anddeeply committed to education. It was he who achieved access to school for everyone in Catalonia, regardless of the family’s economic situation. My father was the director of psychiatry at Sant Pau and later managed the Sant Andreu mental hospital. He had his private practice very close to home. My paternal grandfather was also a doctor, practising in Mallorca. My older brother is a neurophysiologist and works in Los Angeles.

What family memories do you have of the Barcelona of your parents’ era?

My father was an intellectual, and I have a very clear memory of the meetings he held every Sunday with the group he called “the gang”. I remember my mother’s social involvement very particularly. My father was from Mallorca, and he came to live in Barcelona; the family settled in Pedralbes, where, as I said before, he had his practice. He was a psychiatrist and gave me the freedom I needed to develop as a person, for which I will be eternally grateful to him. My mother instilled a strong social concern in me.

Besides the family tradition, when did you decide you wanted to become a doctor?

I did my higher secondary education at the Jesuit school in Barcelona and wanted to study agriculture, because I have always liked nature and research related to the land. However, at that time there was no agricultural university course in Barcelona and it was hard to move away from the family environment. In the end, I chose medicine, thanks also to the influence of Professor Pere Farreras i Valentí, one of the most influential doctors in this country and abroad.

Your older brother chose the same medical speciality as your father. Why did you go for cardiology?

Dr Farreras had a heart attack, when he was 42, if my memory serves me well. He was my tutor or mentor, and he told me that cardiology was a field he had not mastered as well as other areas, and that I could devote myself to it. This advice was absolutely transcendental in my career.

What do you remember about the Barcelona of the 1960s, when you studied medicine at the University of Barcelona, or the Central University, as it was known then?

The most positive thing I remember is the intellectual relationship with some colleagues, such as the philosopher Eugenio Trías Sagnier, the architect Manuel de Solà-Morales and Agustí Arana. We held meetings like those of my father and his “gang”.

And your brief spell at the Hospital Clínic, at the end of your training phase in Catalonia?

There were some very good professors – three or four – but others just used their notes. I preferred books, for example, in English, and to my mind notes lacked intellectual ambition. I had some professors who were simply incapable of motivating their students. That was one of the reasons why I left Spain; I needed motivation. Dr Farreras helped me to get to the United Kingdom first, where medicine was more straightforward and less technical. Then I came back and set my sights on the United States, and there I stayed…

Was it difficult to make it in the States?

They made things very easy for me. I got some very good letters of recommendation from the United Kingdom and was accepted at the Mayo Clinic. I had to start from scratch, but it was worth it.

What is – or what was – so different between the research conducted in North America and in other parts of the world, not to mention Spain?

Motivation. In the United States, people who work are given all kinds of support from day one. But it is a very demanding country: if you work there they will help you, although the level of demand becomes progressively higher…

What are the current challenges in the cardiology field?

The first major challenge is to go from treating diseases to promoting health. Prevention is crucial; developed countries spend vast amounts of money treating preventable diseases. Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of death in the world, since almost 40% of deaths are caused by these types of problems. We are facing an epidemic because of problems from being overweight, bad eating habits, smoking, lack of physical exercise and so forth. Prevention is of the essence, since at this rate it will be impossible to cope with the expenditure incurred in the treatment of disease.

You mentioned other medical challenges…

We need to make progress and relate studies on the heart and brain. A lot of progress is also being made in imaging technologies, genetics and tissue regeneration. Is it also very important that we know how to apply our knowledge to patients quickly. Finally, and more generally, we have to fulfil our social responsibility: doctors have a commitment to society that we cannot forget.

Allow me to remind you of one of society’s great dreams: when will we be able to use stem cells to regenerate a heart damaged by a heart attack?

Many teams all over the world are working with stem cells. The National Cardiovascular Research Centre in Madrid has several lines open in this field. This work will eventually yield positive results, but although part of society and many journalists always enquire about these types of solutions, I would like to emphasise the most effective way forward that we have is within reach: healthier lifestyles and habits.

You attach particular importance to pre-school education, to the habits of younger children…

The things a child learns at the age of four or five are transcendental for their adult life. Learning healthy eating habits and how to look after their body from a young age is something that will stay with them for many years.

Tell us how the education campaign on healthy habits for children through the Sesame Street television series came about.

At an expert meeting addressing the great problem of obesity in the United States, I voiced a critical opinion on the food industry. One of the managers from the Sesame Street production company approached me and we decided to work together. Now we are working on health education programmes with children from all over the world.

Has the experience also been applied to Spain?

The SHE Foundation and Sesame Workshop, with the support of the Daniel and Nina Carasso Foundation, reached an agreement to produce a new Sesame StreetTV series in Spain. Last year, 26 episodes were broadcast, targeting children aged from three to six, in which nutrition, physical activity, knowledge of the body and heart and social and emotional well-being take centre stage. All the contents are prepared by a team of international and local experts in order to instil healthy and lifelong habits in youngsters. It is a series with great potential for expansion.

This gave rise to the Foundation for Science, Health and Education project. Or are they different developments?

We have many parallel programmes and actions in health education matters for people of different ages, and we saw the need to focus all this activity in a foundation that would be dedicated to working on the basis of scientific research with a view to promoting health through communication and education. The collaboration with Sesame Streetis part of the SHE Foundation’s projects.

And how does your foundation’s other flagship project, dedicated to integral health, work?

The SHE Foundation has implemented the SI! (Salut Integral!) [Integral Health!] programme, in which more than 11,000 boys and girls from 61 schools are currently participating. The idea is to go beyond obesity prevention, treating health in an all-encompassing way, through four basic and interrelated components: learning healthy eating habits; physical activity; knowing how our body works – particularly the heart; and managing emotions and promoting social responsibility as a protection factor against addictions and the consumption of substances such as tobacco and drugs.

Fotos: Pere Virgili

Fotos: Pere Virgili

Your recipe for cardiovascular health is easy to recite and — for some people — hard to follow. Could you remind us of the basic ingredients of this recipe?

Prevention is crucial. However, in general, if we want to know how to lead a healthier life, I would highlight three or four specific things: do physical exercise, avoid becoming overweight or obese, maintain a healthy blood pressure and refrain from smoking. Do you think that people don’t know these things? Now it is important to put them into practice.

We used the word “recipe” previously, and you have written informative books, accompanied by experts and figures from many other fields, one of them being the prestigious chef Ferran Adrià. What do you remember about this particular collaboration?

Ferran Adrià has made outstanding contributions to modern cuisine, and in recent years he has also evolved towards other fields, such as healthier and more accessible cooking. The collaboration in the book may seem paradoxical, because I, a researcher, talk about cooking, whereas Ferran Adrià, a chef, explores the world of research. We both share a need, or a moral obligation, to go out there and explain important things, such as the easiest ways to prevent a heart attack or the basics of good nutrition. The journalist Josep Corbella managed to convey all this in the book.

You manage research centres on both sides of the Atlantic and run top-level research lines all over the world, so how do you find the time to write books and spread science?

I do it to contribute to the society that has given me so much. It is a gesture of responsibility. In the case of books, I have written with outstanding people such as Ferran Adrià, who we just mentioned, the psychiatrist Luis Rojas Marcos in Corazón y mente [Heart and Mind], and the writer and economist Jose Luis Sampedro in La ciencia y la vida [Science and Life]. I wrote the first book of this kind,  La ciència de la salut [The Science of Health], in collaboration with the journalist Josep Corbella. In all cases I would like to emphasise that I have met highly motivated people strongly committed to society, although the fields they work in and their ways of thinking are different to my own.

In any event, defend your field of work a little for us. Should society give scientific research greater recognition and invest in it more?

It is evident that society does not properly acknowledge the work of researchers and the importance of science. Our future depends on important matters such as education and science, and citizens therefore must have a greater scientific culture, and research should be given major importance. In this regard, the media and journalists have an important role to play. You have to tell society that science fuels a country’s future.

How do you see the future of scientific research in Spain in general and in Catalonia in particular?

I am concerned. We have been working for years to push science forward and now there are great challenges and problems to overcome. In any case I hope that the positive line will continue. The National Cardiovascular Research Centre, sited in Madrid, but which is spreading all over Spain and abroad, works on many projects that lead to significant scientific progress and we aim to continue along this path. Catalonia is one of the European regions with top-quality researchers who engage in very good scientific research. Major cutbacks in the scientific research budget will only jeopardise the future.

Have you ever missed working in medicine in Barcelona full-time?

I have a very close relationship with Barcelona. I work on a great deal of projects related to research and health in the city and am delighted to be able to continue to do so.

2012 National Culture Award

In Catalonia, Dr Valentí Fuster was awarded the 2012 National Culture Award, in the Thought and Scientific Culture category, for “his contributions to biomedicine in the cardiovascular field and untiring commitment to promoting social awareness in order to improve health by means of disease prevention,” according to the awards panel, which is given by the National Council for Culture and the Arts (CoNCA).

Born in Barcelona on 20 January, 1943, Fuster holds a degree in medicine from the University of Barcelona and honorary degrees from some 30 universities all over the world. He began his career as a cardiologist in Edinburgh (United Kingdom) and settled in the United States in 1972. He lectured in medicine and cardiovascular diseases at the Mayo Medical School in Minnesota and at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, and was Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston from 1991 to 1994.

He has authored almost a thousand scientific articles and two of the most prestigious books at international level on clinical cardiology and research, and his work has had a great impact in helping to improve the treatment of patients with cardiac illnesses. His research into the origin of cardiovascular accidents has earned him the most major awards from four of the world’s four major cardiology organisations, including the 2012 American Heart Association (AHA) Research Achievement Award. In 1996 he received the Prince of Asturias Research Award. J.E.

Anna Veiga: “We have to make an effort and keep scientific projects on course”

Hanging on the coat rack on the back of her office door, there is a jumper, a lab coat and dozens of lanyards with IDs for congresses and seminars specialising in human reproduction in which Anna Veiga has participated over the last few years. One of the scientific meetings that has taken its place on the Stem Cell Bank director’s coat rack is the annual congress of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, one of the world’s foremost scientific organisations, which Anna Veiga has chaired since the summer of 2011.

Anna Veiga

©Pere Virgili

The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology’s annual meeting, held in Istanbul in July this year, helped to highlight the fact that since the birth of Louise Brown, in 1978, five million children have come into the world thanks to in vitro fertilisation (IVF)…

This figure demonstrates that in vitro fertilisation is a fully consolidated technique with a standardised methodology that helps to solve many fertility problems. It is a safe technique that yields similar results to births without assisted reproduction.

Is the number of in vitro fertilisation treatments in the world still on the increase? Particularly in industrialised countries due to late motherhood…

It is true that it is one of the reasons for the growth of these techniques. There are no studies that clearly indicate that our society has more infertility problems than a few decades ago. However, it is evident that women are having children later and this brings complications in becoming pregnant. Many of the cases of infertility that we see today are due to the mother’s age.

Anna Veiga

©Pere Virgili

What is the work area of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, which you chair?

It is one of the world’s two most important scientific associations in the field of human reproduction; we might say that we are a bit ahead of the North American society. Our objective is to provide scientific support to assisted reproduction activities, furnish scientific evidence on the efficacy of techniques, collect data on the sector’s activity and issue guidelines for the best application of procedures.

What are the future challenges facing IVF? Years ago it was said that the biggest problem is the multiple pregnancies induced by this technique.

Multiple pregnancies are still one of the complications of assisted reproduction techniques, although in recent years twin births have diminished substantially. We have improved the techniques and know a lot more about the cases in which it is justified to transfer more than one embryo, and in which cases we can transfer two embryos, or three at most. In some countries this aspect has even been regulated; in the Spanish state, for example, the law says that no more than three embryos can be transferred in each procedure.

The statistics show that in recent years the number of multiple births has grown considerably, and this is essentially due to assisted reproduction.

You can see this by simply strolling through the streets: there are more twins about. You realise it’s a fact when some advertising campaigns even use the multiple-birth hook.

©Pere Virgili

When Louise Brown was born, in 1978, you were studying biology at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. At that time did you think that one day you might end up working in human reproduction research?

No, the truth is that I didn’t. That piece of news really caught my attention, but at that time I only had a general interest in genetics and cell cultures. There was a lecturer who really inspired me on those topics.

The late Josep Egozcue…

Exactly. I finished university and by chance I read an interview with Dr Pere Barri, of the Clínica Dexeus, which said they were doing inseminations, and I thought: this is an emerging field and it might be good to get involved in it.

So, is it true that it all began when you read an interview in the Ser Padres magazine?

After reading it, I made some enquiries until I managed to talk to Dr Barri to offer him my services. I realised that I did not have a lot to offer: I had just graduated in biology, and was rather short on medical training. He was very kind, but could not initially offer me a great deal because he had no consolidated project. But that was where it all began.

Do you have a family background in the research world?

Not at all. My father was in advertising; he had worked in the automotive industry and in motor journalism. There was no kind of scientific or medical or biological tradition.

What part of Barcelona is your family from?

My grandparents and mother left Gran Via during the Civil War and took refuge in Pedralbes in a house the family had used as a summer residence. I was brought up there and then lived in different neighbourhoods of Barcelona, but after some time I returned to the same house in Pedralbes.

Had the house and the neighbourhood changed a lot?

Obviously the area had changed a little, but the house is the same. I like going back to the neighbourhood where I had always lived, and life is good there.

Scientific Barcelona has undergone some major transformations since your student days…

We have made a lot of progress, we have raised our game. We realised that if a country wants to evolve it has to progress scientifically. It needs all the necessary resources and tools for this to be so. Centres were set up, such as the Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, where the Centre of Regenerative Medicine, where I am employed, is located. At that time science was growing steadily.

And now how do you see the present and the future?

We are a bit apprehensive because the situation is terrible and dramatic. There are cutbacks everywhere, and we have also been hit. The thing with research is that it takes a lot for countries to reach a good level but on the other hand it is very easy to lose that level. It is hard to recover growth. There are many other countries with problems that strive to preserve their research in order to guarantee progress in the medium and long term. Barcelona and Catalonia in general had managed to attract top-level scientists, and not only because of our nice climate – which is true – but also because we have a good scientific level. It is difficult, but we have to make an effort to carry on and keep scientific projects on course.

Going back to your professional career, what is the most memorable part of the birth of Victòria Anna, the first baby born by in vitro fertilisation in the Spanish state, largely thanks to your work?

Everything!

On the subject of the name and the date, on 12 July – more specifically 1984 –, you say that it was your own personal Victòria, or Victory, Day.

Absolutely. It was a truly exciting day. They were very special moments because everything was new, because we knew that new paths were being opened up to solve fertility problems that affect many people… Moreover, that child’s birth showed that we were on the right track and that the technique worked.

The good memories are always the ones that last, but success did not come easy…

It was hard, but no more so than it was for other groups at the time. Remember that back then it was very difficult to get training in this specialty, to learn how the techniques worked. Now there are master’s programmes and training courses that make things very easy.

Sometimes memory erases negative feelings. In the 1980s there were also groups and people opposed to IVF, albeit a minority.

To tell you the truth, those movements were small and did not really bother us. Most people were delighted with the work we were doing. The real problems were different, such as the times when the technical side of things didn’t work out the way we expected…

Could you elaborate on this specific case you have in mind?

I’m referring to the first pregnancy our team achieved with in vitro fertilisation. The pregnancy test was positive but the ultrasound showed that the embryo had not been implanted in the uterine cavity, but rather in the Fallopian tube, so the pregnancy could not go ahead. It was just one week before Dolors, Victòria’s mother, had a positive pregnancy test.

Did you have the feeling that there were teams competing with you?

It wasn’t a feeling, it was a fact. There was a great deal of competition between two groups: ours and the team led by Dr Marina, also in Barcelona. We knew perfectly well that they were doing exactly the same as us. It really was a race.

Why did you decide to expand your professional career into stem cell research?

Things are sometimes a product of many twists of fate, or a convergence of different circumstances. I was lucky to meet Juan Carlos Izpusúa [director of the Centre of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona ever since its foundation]; at that time, the law provided for the possibility of doing research with embryonic stem cells, and resources were being invested in this specialty… I found myself on a path that was leading me to get involved in this area, and I didn’t have a moment’s hesitation. It was a privilege to make the leap into this new field, although I have never left behind assisted reproduction, and the proof of that is that I chair the European Society, although it is a non-professional position.

Moreover, you are still linked to the Institut Dexeus…

Yes, I’m the scientific director of the Reproductive Medicine Department at the Institut Dexeus.

What work is being done by the Stem Cell Bank you manage?

We started out with embryonic stem cells. We signed agreements with different assisted reproduction centres that provided us with embryos that couples no longer wanted for reproduction and used them to harvest stem cells. This led us to different cell lines that are duly recorded and can be made available to researchers who request them. The methodology known as IPS [Induced Pluripotent Stem] cells subsequently appeared, which allows us to obtain cells that are very similar to embryonic cells, but without using embryos.

IPS cells were described internationally between 2006 and 2007…

Yes. Our group published a scientific study in 2008 in which we explained a technique for creating IPS cells. In summary, the idea consists of using any cell, from the skin, for example, to make it go backwards in its programming and turn it into an embryo-like cell, with the capacity to become any other body cell.

Are you still working in these fields?

Yes; moreover, we are working to take a direct leap from one cell type to another. We directly convert a skin cell to a neuron. This summer, a major international scientific journal published a study led by a researcher from the Centre de Medicina Regenerativa de Barcelona, which explains how umbilical cord cells have been turned into neurons.

Could this type of work be useful in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s?

In the long term, yes. At this moment in time there are only two clinical trials in the world with embryonic stem cells, not with IPS cells, and both projects are related to macular degeneration diseases. For example, in one of the studies, embryonic stem cells are converted into retinal precursors, and these new cells are injected into people with this problem in the retina that is making them go blind.

Wasn’t there another clinical trial being conducted with embryonic cells to restore spinal cord function?

It took many years to get this trial approved, and it eventually got under way. Afterwards, however, when the first phase of the work had begun with two patients, the company in charge decided to stop the project and focus on cancer programmes.

Are the IPS cells an alternative to embryonic stem cells because they avoid the use of embryos?

Most of the people working in this field have a clear understanding of the ethical level of our work. IPS cells are fashionable because use of them it is a new methodology and they are an excellent model for understanding how things work. Perhaps too much attention is being paid to IPS, but we must not forget that the pluripotency standard of cells lies in the embryonic cells.

Victòria’s scientific “mother”

Anna Veiga Lluch was born in Barcelona in 1956 and graduated with a biology degree from the Autonomous University of Barcelona (1979), where she also completed her cum laude PhD (1991). Shortly after finishing her degree she started to collaborate with Dr Pere Barri’s team at the Clínica Dexeus, and in July 1984 she became the scientific mother of Victòria Anna, the first child born in the Spanish state thanks to in vitro fertilisation. She was founder and chairperson (1993 – 2003) of the Spanish Embryologist Society and director of the IVF laboratory at the Institut Universitari Dexeus (1982 – 2004), an organisation she is still linked to as scientific director of the Reproductive Medicine Department (since 2005). Anna Veiga has been an adjunct lecturer in the Department of Experimental and Health Sciences at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra since 2002, and is a coordinator of the Master’s in Reproductive Biology at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. She has received some 20 awards and social and academic distinctions, including the Creu de Sant Jordi (2004) and the Premi Nacional de Pensament i Cultura Científica [National Award for Scientific Thought and Culture] (2006) for her contribution to the dissemination and consolidation of scientific progress, particularly in the sphere of biomedicine. Anna Veiga has been the director of the Stem Cell Bank of the Centre de Medicina Regenerativa de Barcelona since 2005 and chairperson of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology since the summer of 2011.

Òscar Tomico, reflections on design

Òscar Tomico

© Pere Virgili
Òscar Tomico

The objects around us are such an important part of our world that sometimes we do not even realise that they transform our lives. The design of tools and machines, for example, not only makes our daily life easy or difficult; it also determines how we live. In this sense, designers have an “ethical responsibility” when they decide to give shape to an object that will be used by millions of people, explains Òscar Tomico, a young Catalan researcher working at the Eindhoven University of Technology (The Netherlands). It is not that the designer has to relinquish their work and become a mere “facilitator” who draws, in a simple fashion, what some consumers believe they want, but rather that a social commitment has to be reached so that the designer can take their role as a transformer on board in a conscious and positive way. Tomico proposes a “joint reflection” between designers and users to address the basic reasons that drive designers, user motivations and social values.

“Our department is not the classic industrial design team, as we focus on the phases prior to design, studying society and detecting opportunities to design what the future may be like”, he asserts. His proposal involves “achieving a more natural, more human relationship between people and technology; the whole body, its movements, and the clothes we wear, can be used to communicate our identity, better understand our body’s condition or improve physical capacity”.

Òscar Tomico was born in the Esquerra de l’Eixample district of Barcelona in 1979. He took his PhD at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech (UPC) in 2007 with a thesis based on constructivist psychology, studying subjective experience applied to the design of interaction. He has been a visiting researcher and speaker at different universities and design schools and co-directed the “Creative Challenge” project by Philips (2009). Tomico curated the exhibition presented at the Disseny Hub Barcelona by the Department of Industrial Design of Eindhoven University of Technology, where he has been working for five years; he is currently employed as assistant professor of the Designing Quality in Interaction research group.

“The work done by my research group makes sense in an area with an industrial fabric such as the south of the Netherlands; Catalonia is making a lot of progress, and I believe that the research we do in the Netherlands in the design of intelligent products and systems could also be applied in our country, for example, to intelligent lighting or textiles”, says Tomico, who concludes: “It is not a luxury; the joint reflection technique can be applied to any area. I have worked with people from la Salle, Telefónica and Turisme de Catalunya on similar projects.”